Bryan Kohberger’s Defense to Claim DNA Was Planted?
The defense team for Bryan Kohberger, the accused in the Idaho college student murders, is reportedly not disputing that his DNA was found on the knife sheath left at the crime scene. Instead, they will argue that the evidence was planted, setting up a dramatic battle in court.
🚨 Legal Strategy Breakdown:
- Admitting the DNA is his but challenging how it got there is a bold move.
- The defense will likely argue that investigators mishandled evidence or planted it to frame Kohberger.
- NewsNation’s Brian Entin & Jesse Weber believe this could create reasonable doubt in the jury’s mind.
🔍 Key Questions the Defense May Raise:
✅ Could law enforcement have contaminated or mishandled the evidence?
✅ Was the knife sheath actually at the crime scene the entire time?
✅ Why is Kohberger’s DNA present but no other physical evidence directly linking him to the murders?
📺 Ashleigh Banfield Weighs In:
Banfield, a seasoned crime journalist, points out that this “DNA planting” defense has been used in other high-profile cases. However, it’s difficult to prove unless investigators made serious mistakes.
⚖️ What This Means for the Trial:
If the defense succeeds in creating doubt about the DNA, the prosecution will need to reinforce their case with other evidence, such as:
- Cell phone records
- Surveillance footage
- Eyewitness testimonies
👀 What do you think? Is this a strong defense, or is it just a desperate legal strategy? Drop your thoughts below! ⬇️
